Physiological effects have been observed in humans when exposed to weak electromagnetic fields (EMFs) pulsed at specific frequencies, such as ½ Hz or 2.4 Hz. These fields can excite sensory resonance, affecting the nervous system. Interestingly, many computer monitors and TV screens emit pulsed EMFs capable of causing such effects, even when the pulses are subliminal. This phenomenon raises both intriguing possibilities and significant concerns regarding the use of electromagnetic energy (EE) systems that leverage these fields for therapeutic purposes.
Patent: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/patent/US-6506148-B2
Introduction
Electromagnetic energy (EE) systems have been gaining attention for their potential to influence the nervous system using electromagnetic fields generated by monitors and screens. These systems promise various health benefits, but they also come with potential risks. In this article, we’ll explore the pros and cons of EE systems, particularly in the context of nervous system manipulation through EMFs.
The Pros of EE Systems
- Potential Therapeutic Benefits:
EE systems are designed to use specific frequencies of electromagnetic fields to influence the nervous system. These fields can stimulate certain physiological responses, which may have therapeutic effects, such as reducing stress, improving sleep, or aiding in nervous system repair. For example, pulsed EMFs near frequencies like ½ Hz or 2.4 Hz can induce sensory resonance, potentially providing a calming effect. - Non-Invasive Treatment:
Unlike more invasive medical treatments, EE systems offer a non-invasive approach to nervous system modulation. This could make them an appealing option for individuals seeking alternative therapies for conditions such as anxiety, insomnia, or chronic pain. - Accessibility and Convenience:
With the proliferation of computer monitors and TVs, EE systems are accessible to a wide audience. Many of these systems can be used at home, making them a convenient option for those looking to manage their health without frequent visits to healthcare providers.
The Cons of EE Systems
- High Levels of Electro-Smog Radiation:
One of the major concerns with EE systems is the emission of electro-smog, or electromagnetic pollution. Research and actual measurements have shown that these monitors emit high levels of EMFs, often exceeding recommended safety levels. These screens primarily produce plasma radiation or electromagnetic fields, not the so-called “Bio Scalar” fields that are often claimed. Over several tests and searches, we found no signs of an actual Bio Scalar field being generated. Prolonged exposure to these fields, especially at levels ranging from 75 to 250 mg, can pose significant health risks, including increased stress, disrupted sleep, and potential long-term damage to the nervous system. - Unproven Long-Term Effects:
While some short-term benefits have been reported, the long-term effects of EE systems on human health are still largely unknown. The manipulation of the nervous system through EMFs is a relatively new field, and there is limited research on the potential risks associated with prolonged use. This uncertainty makes it difficult to fully endorse EE systems without more extensive studies. - Marketing Buzzwords vs. Scientific Evidence:
The popularity of EE systems has led to the use of buzzwords like “Bio Scalar,” “PEMF,” and “Biohacks” in marketing materials. While these terms sound promising, they often lack solid scientific backing. Many products capitalize on these terms to attract consumers, but the actual benefits may not align with the claims. This can lead to consumers spending large amounts of money on products that may not deliver the promised results.
Proposed Mechanism
The patent suggests that by pulsing images displayed on a screen at specific frequencies (around ½ Hz or 2.4 Hz), it may be possible to induce effects in the nervous system of a person viewing the screen. The electromagnetic fields generated by the screen are theorized to be the mechanism of action. However, these fields are primarily plasma radiation or standard EMFs, rather than the exotic “Bio Scalar” fields often mentioned in marketing materials.
Conclusion
EE systems, which leverage electromagnetic fields from monitors for nervous system manipulation, offer a mix of potential benefits and risks. While they provide a non-invasive and accessible form of therapy, the high levels of electro-smog radiation and the unknown long-term effects are significant concerns. Additionally, the use of marketing buzzwords can sometimes overshadow the need for solid scientific evidence. For short-term use, particularly for nervous system reset or repair, EE systems might offer some benefits. However, caution is advised when considering prolonged exposure due to the potential health risks associated with high levels of electromagnetic radiation.
As with any emerging technology, further research is necessary to fully understand the implications of EE systems on human health. Until then, users should approach these systems with a balanced view, weighing the pros and cons carefully before integrating them into their health routines.