The Pros and Cons of EE Systems: Nervous System Manipulation by Electromagnetic Fields from Monitors

by | Aug 14, 2024 | Articles, EE systems, Latest News

Physiological effects have been observed in humans when exposed to weak electromagnetic fields (EMFs) pulsed at specific frequencies, such as ½ Hz or 2.4 Hz. These fields can excite sensory resonance, affecting the nervous system. Interestingly, many computer monitors and TV screens emit pulsed EMFs capable of causing such effects, even when the pulses are subliminal. This phenomenon raises both intriguing possibilities and significant concerns regarding the use of electromagnetic energy (EE) systems that leverage these fields for therapeutic purposes.

Patent: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/patent/US-6506148-B2

Introduction

Electromagnetic energy (EE) systems have been gaining attention for their potential to influence the nervous system using electromagnetic fields generated by monitors and screens. These systems promise various health benefits, but they also come with potential risks. In this article, we’ll explore the pros and cons of EE systems, particularly in the context of nervous system manipulation through EMFs.

The Energy Enhancement System (EES) uses electromagnetic fields and frequencies ranging from 1Hz to 10kHz, which can be measured as light wavelengths. While these frequencies are often advertised during onboarding, they are sometimes exaggerated in their effectiveness. The system is not based on Scalar waves, which are distinct from electromagnetic fields. Mopa, a BioScalar energy device, works with a much stronger energy field and utilizes a full spectrum of frequencies, delivering results beyond what LED technology in the EES can provide.

The Pros of EE Systems

  1. Potential Therapeutic Benefits:
    EE systems are designed to use specific frequencies of electromagnetic fields to influence the nervous system. These fields can stimulate certain physiological responses, which may have therapeutic effects, such as reducing stress, improving sleep, or aiding in nervous system repair. For example, pulsed EMFs near frequencies like ½ Hz or 2.4 Hz can induce sensory resonance, potentially providing a calming effect.
  2. Non-Invasive Treatment:
    Unlike more invasive medical treatments, EE systems offer a non-invasive approach to nervous system modulation. This could make them an appealing option for individuals seeking alternative therapies for conditions such as anxiety, insomnia, or chronic pain.
  3. Accessibility and Convenience:
    With the proliferation of computer monitors and TVs, EE systems are accessible to a wide audience. Many of these systems can be used at home, making them a convenient option for those looking to manage their health without frequent visits to healthcare providers.
  4. Looks cool! (Coolness factor)
  5. Energy boosting: Enhances vitality and supports natural healing.
  6. Helps with repair and regeneration: LED technology can aid in cellular repair and regeneration, especially for skin or superficial tissues.
  7. No surgery or downtime: Does not disrupt daily activities.

The Cons of EE Systems

  1. High Levels of Electro-Smog Radiation:
    One of the major concerns with EE systems is the emission of electro-smog, or electromagnetic pollution. Research and actual measurements have shown that these monitors emit high levels of EMFs, often exceeding recommended safety levels. These screens primarily produce plasma radiation or electromagnetic fields, not the so-called “Bio Scalar” fields that are often claimed. Over several tests and searches, we found no signs of an actual Bio Scalar field being generated. Prolonged exposure to these fields, especially at levels ranging from 75 to 250 mg, can pose significant health risks, including increased stress, disrupted sleep, and potential long-term damage to the nervous system.
  2. Unproven Long-Term Effects:
    While some short-term benefits have been reported, the long-term effects of EE systems on human health are still largely unknown. The manipulation of the nervous system through EMFs is a relatively new field, and there is limited research on the potential risks associated with prolonged use. This uncertainty makes it difficult to fully endorse EE systems without more extensive studies.
  3. Marketing Buzzwords vs. Scientific Evidence:
    The popularity of EE systems has led to the use of buzzwords like “Bio Scalar,” “PEMF,” and “Biohacks” in marketing materials. While these terms sound promising, they often lack solid scientific backing. Many products capitalize on these terms to attract consumers, but the actual benefits may not align with the claims. This can lead to consumers spending large amounts of money on products that may not deliver the promised results.
  4. Limited penetration: LED technology is less effective for deeper tissues compared to advanced systems like Mopa.
  5. Effectiveness varies: Results may differ based on frequency settings and individual needs.
  6. Overhyped claims: Some marketing materials exaggerate the system’s capabilities.
  7. Cost: High-quality devices can be expensive. Paying like $20,000 for a range of 1Hz to 10Khz is truly an overkill!
  8. Limited frequency range: The 1Hz to 10kHz range may not cover the full spectrum of energy healing that devices like Mopa can provide.

Don’t take my word for it, These are the numbers that Dr. Sandra uses when she is describing the effects of the EE system, as you can see 20mv to 100mv = 1Hz to 10Khz (approx).

Proposed Mechanism

The patent suggests that by pulsing images displayed on a screen at specific frequencies (around ½ Hz or 2.4 Hz), it may be possible to induce effects in the nervous system of a person viewing the screen. The electromagnetic fields generated by the screen are theorized to be the mechanism of action. However, these fields are primarily plasma radiation or standard EMFs, rather than the exotic “Bio Scalar” fields often mentioned in marketing materials.

Can LED Technology Be Used for Hypnosis & Mind Control?

LED lights are everywhere on our screens, in streetlights, billboards, and therapy devices. But research suggests that flickering LEDs at specific frequencies can influence brainwave activity, raising questions about their use in hypnosis, brainwave entrainment, and subconscious programming.

How It Works

LEDs can be pulsed at frequencies that align with different brainwave states:

  • Alpha & Theta Waves – Induce relaxation, trance-like states, and increased suggestibility.
  • Beta Waves – Enhance focus but may also cause agitation.
  • Delta Waves – Linked to deep sleep and subconscious access.

By using flashing LED patterns combined with audio frequencies, some studies suggest these effects can be used for:

  • Hypnotic Suggestion – Lowering conscious resistance to outside influence.
  • Subliminal Programming – Influencing thoughts and emotions without direct awareness.
  • Neuromarketing & Advertising – Subtly guiding consumer decisions.
  • Entertainment & Gaming – Creating immersive experiences that alter perception and focus.

Potential Risks & Ethical Concerns

  • Could everyday screens be flickering in ways that affect behavior?
  • Can this technology be used to manipulate emotions or decisions without consent?
  • Are digital platforms experimenting with mind-altering LED techniques?

Research & Further Reading

While LED technology has potential benefits for therapy and relaxation, its applications in subconscious influence raise important ethical questions. What do you think—scientific advancement or something already shaping our digital world?

Conclusion

EE systems, which leverage electromagnetic fields from monitors for nervous system manipulation, offer a mix of potential benefits and risks. While they provide a non-invasive and accessible form of therapy, the high levels of electro-smog radiation and the unknown long-term effects are significant concerns. Additionally, the use of marketing buzzwords can sometimes overshadow the need for solid scientific evidence. For short-term use, particularly for nervous system reset or repair, EE systems might offer some benefits. However, caution is advised when considering prolonged exposure due to the potential health risks associated with high levels of electromagnetic radiation.

As with any emerging technology, further research is necessary to fully understand the implications of EE systems on human health. Until then, users should approach these systems with a balanced view, weighing the pros and cons carefully before integrating them into their health routines.

Other Discussions:

Subject: Response to Your Article on the EE System

Dear Art,

I recently read your article on the Energy Enhancement System (EESystem), and I’d like to respectfully offer an alternative perspective based on my direct experience and work with clients.

From my understanding, scalar energy is a non-linear, multidimensional field that is not part of the conventional electromagnetic spectrum. The EESystem is designed to harness this energy through photonic interactions that create a high-energy, coherent environment. These interactions appear to stimulate mitochondrial function, which may support the body’s natural ability to repair and restore itself.

One of the most compelling cases I’ve witnessed involved a 21-year-old client diagnosed with stage 3 glioblastoma. Since last August, this individual has spent 4 to 8 hours per day in the EESystem environment. Over time, we observed a progressive reduction in tumor size, and just two weeks ago, they were informed that the tumor was no longer active—only residual, dead tissue remained. While anecdotal, the significance of this case for those involved cannot be overstated.

Additionally, many clients report noticeable improvements in sleep quality after just a few sessions. Others have experienced relief from anxiety and depression. I never prescribe how often someone should attend sessions—I offer guidance, and they determine what works best. Some clients choose to return weekly because they say it helps them maintain their emotional and energetic balance.

I’d also like to note a key safety difference between the EESystem and other energetic therapies, such as magnetic resonance-based devices. Your products rely on magnetic resonance, which can be contraindicated for individuals with pacemakers or other implanted medical devices. The EESystem, by contrast, has shown no interference with such devices, making it more accessible to a broader range of individuals.

I had originally considered incorporating your PEMF therapy into my practice. However, after reading your article, I question whether your conclusions about the EESystem reflect an in-depth, open-minded evaluation of its potential benefits. If you’re truly interested in assessing the system and its impact, I invite you to visit my center in Minnesota. I’d be more than happy to collaborate, share what we’re seeing, and offer a firsthand look at how clients are responding.

Respectfully,
Kelly W.

Our Response:

Dear Kelly,

Thank you for your thoughtful and sincere message. I genuinely appreciate you taking the time to share your experience, your client case studies, and your openness to dialogue. It’s clear you are deeply committed to supporting healing, and I respect that immensely.

That said, I would like to respond from a technical and engineering standpoint, particularly regarding concerns about the long-term safety profile of LED-based energy systems like the EESystem.

1.⁠ ⁠Scalar Energy – Physics vs. Interpretation
You mention that the EESystem is designed to harness scalar energy a non-linear, multidimensional field outside the electromagnetic spectrum. While this concept is widely referenced in alternative healing, it’s important to note that in classical and modern physics, scalar fields (such as gravitational potential or temperature gradients) do not propagate energy in the way electromagnetic waves do. They are non-radiative and cannot be generated through standard LED photonic systems, which by design operate via linear electromagnetic interactions.

A system using flickering LED panels with phosphor-coated diodes fundamentally relies on visible light emission, not on scalar field principles. The underlying operating mechanism is photoelectric and electromagnetic, and no current physics-based evidence supports that such a configuration can produce a coherent scalar field independent of measurable EM radiation.

2.⁠ ⁠EMF & Dirty Electricity from High-Output LED Arrays
Through direct EMF testing during a one-month trial period, we identified extremely high levels of dirty electricity and electromagnetic noise emitted from EE-style panel arrays. Using EMF meters and oscilloscopes, measurements showed:

Voltage transients between 20 mV to over 100 mV

Frequency spikes in the 1 Hz to 10 kHz range

Electromagnetic interference (EMI) from poorly shielded switching power supplies and LED drivers

This is not uncommon. LED panels (especially those modified or operated outside standard tolerances) often create significant harmonic distortion and transient voltage noise, especially when scaled into large panel arrays. For individuals sensitive to EMFs, including myself, this consistently resulted in headaches and neurological overstimulation within just 15 minutes of exposure.

While the system may feel calming to some, it may simultaneously overload sensitive nervous systems due to pulsed EMI, invisible flicker, and dirty electricity all of which can impact mitochondrial and brainwave function in ways contrary to the healing intent.

3.⁠ ⁠Blue Light Hazard & Flicker-Based Brain Stress
Modern LED-based systems, especially those with high blue light peaks around 450–470 nm, pose additional concerns:

Blue light suppresses melatonin, disrupts circadian rhythms, and induces retinal stress in prolonged exposures

High-frequency invisible flicker, even when not consciously perceived, has been shown in EEG studies to induce cortical stress, headaches, and visual fatigue

In therapeutic environments, subtle flicker or PWM (pulse-width modulation) should always be minimized or avoided

If one were to conduct a before-and-after qEEG scan during or after an EESystem session, alpha wave coherence, delta/theta regulation, and even default mode network behavior may show disruption in sensitive individuals, especially those prone to flicker sensitivity or electrical hypersensitivity.

4.⁠ ⁠Safety, Accessibility, and System Complexity
While it is commendable that the EESystem claims to be pacemaker-safe (due to lack of magnetic field use), this must be weighed against:

High levels of low-frequency EMF and electrical noise are undetectable without proper instruments

Closed-system architecture requiring specialized technical support, limiting user empowerment

Audible fan noise or hum leading to the use of headphones for comfort, which ironically adds back magnetic and acoustic fields into the session

By contrast, technologies such as Rodin coils, low-frequency PEMF with adjustable waveform outputs, and open-source analog systems allow users to fully monitor, customize, and shield their setups with minimal EMI, flicker, or unwanted photonic load.

5.⁠ ⁠The Role of Placebo and Client Expectations
We also recognize and appreciate the immense power of belief, environment, and placebo in healing. When a client spends $10,000 to $100,000 or more on a healing modality, the brain and body often engage in heightened coherence, driven by emotional investment and intention. This is not a flaw it’s human physiology. However, it also means results can’t be used as proof of mechanism without controlling for variables like EMF, field type, and waveform geometry.

Final Thoughts
Kelly, I honor your commitment and the care you offer to your clients. My critique of the EESystem is not personal it is a call for greater technical scrutiny and transparent measurement in the field of energetic medicine. As someone who is deeply involved in developing frequency healing solutions myself, I strongly support all innovations that promote natural healing but only when they can be validated, measured, and aligned with long-term safety.

I’d be happy to continue this conversation or even collaborate on neutral testing—qEEG, EMF monitoring, HRV, or frequency field mapping so we can move this industry forward with integrity and open science.

Warm regards,
Art Tawanghar